The Regulators Rear Their Heads
As FinTech innovation and products take more ambitious and creative forms, it seems regulators have become more ambitious and creative themselves, and no less determined to act. Robert A. Schwinger explores recent developments in this edition of his Blockchain Law column.
September 27, 2021 at 12:45 PM
16 minute read
The days when there were just a few recurrent regulatory issues in the world of blockchain, cryptocurrency and decentralized finance (DeFi) may now be behind us. For the past few years, regulatory attention seemed to focus mainly on several recurrent issues such as whether a particular token or cryptocurrency was a "security" under federal law—with all the attendant legal requirements and restrictions such a designation carries with it for issuers, exchanges, and buyers and sellers—and the tax consequences of cryptocurrency transactions and payments, given the IRS position that for tax purposes cryptocurrency is property rather than currency. While those issues haven't gone away, recently regulators from a number of different federal, state and, indeed, international bodies have emerged forcefully to raise a host of new issues they find implicated by new developments. As FinTech innovation and products take more ambitious and creative forms, it seems regulators have become more ambitious and creative themselves, and no less determined to act.
Derivative Instruments and the CTFC
On June 8, 2021, Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gave a keynote address at the FIA and SIFMA-AMG, Asset Management Derivatives Forum 2021, in part to address his "concerns regarding the rise of decentralized financial markets." In his remarks, Commissioner Berkovitz argued that the financial system had "developed over the past two or three hundred years" to "rel[y] extensively on financial intermediaries … to reliably provide critical financial services to support the financial markets and the investing public." He pointed to intermediaries performing roles such as providing information to the public, being subject to "fiduciary or other legal duties to act in the best interests of their customers," providing liquidity and stability in times of stress, providing custody of assets, preventing money-laundering, operating through "established standards of conduct," and having legal responsibility and accountability when standards are not met or "things go wrong."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1After Botched Landing of United Airlines Boeing 767, Unlikely Plaintiff Sues Carrier
- 2DOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
- 3No Injury: Despite Proven Claims, Antitrust Suit Fails
- 4Miami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
- 5Trump Ordered by UK Court to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250