Petitioners, occupants at the subject building (building), sought, an order “to correct outstanding violations and a finding they have been harassed, as defined in the Housing Maintenance Code (HMC).” The court had issued an order to correct the outstanding violations. A trial was then scheduled to determine the petitioners’ remaining claims, including harassment.

The petitioners had advised the respondents that they intended to call “A,” an employee of petitioners’ law firm (paralegal), as a trial witness. The respondents moved for an order barring “A” from testifying, arguing that she “acted as an attorney for petitioners.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]