It took more than five decades, the advocacy of their attorneys and a new investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced after the release of a Netflix documentary, but the men convicted of civil rights leader Malcolm X's assassination were exonerated on Thursday. Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Ellen Biben cleared Muhammad Aziz and Khalil Islam in the Feb. 21, 1965, slaying of Malcolm X at Harlem's Audubon Ballroom as he was preparing to deliver a speech. He was 39. Aziz and Islam and a third man, Mujahid Abdul Halim, were convicted of the assassination; Aziz and Islam maintained their innocence and Halim said that the other two men were not involved in the killing. David Shanies of Shanies Law and the Innocence Project fought for Aziz and Islam's exoneration. "These innocent men experienced the agony of decades in prison for a crime they did not commit," Shanies said in a statement released by the Innocence Project. "They were robbed of their freedom in the prime of their lives and branded the killers of a towering civil rights leader." Aziz and Islam were paroled in the 1980s. Islam died in 2009 and Aziz is now 83 years old. Following the release of Netflix's 2020 documentary "Who Killed Malcolm X?," Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. announced that his office had reopened the investigation into Malcolm X's killing. The reinvestigation, which began in January 2020, revealed the existence of FBI records proving Aziz and Islam's innocence that were unavailable to both the defense and the prosecution during the trial. There was no evidence tying Aziz and Islam to Malcolm X's slaying, according to the Innocence Project. "Officially correcting the false historical narrative around one of the most significant events in 20th century U.S. history allows us to learn from and prevent future miscarriages of justice," Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck said in a statement. "Indeed, as George Orwell once said: he who controls the past controls the future. Nowhere is that seen more clearly than in this case." The FBI and the New York City Police department told The Associated Press that they cooperated with the investigation but declined to comment further.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
Pelotons, Gym, Napping Rooms: Latest Law Firm Renovations 'Draw People' In with Home Amenities
4 minute readDonning the 'Dissent Chain': Asian American Judges Group Honors Judicial Leaders With Unorthodox Trophies
85-Year-Old New York Court Officer Retires After 62 Years of Service
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250