DOJ's Latest Attempt To Tame the Crypto-Creature: NCET
The formation of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team heralds a focus of enforcement resources towards the financial ecosystem that allows ransomware and similar threats to flourish.
December 06, 2021 at 11:00 AM
9 minute read
Financial Services and BankingGone are the days when cryptocurrency could remain largely ignored and safely relegated to a dark corner of the internet: Today, even telephone and mortgage companies are beginning to accept payments in cryptocurrency. Yet simultaneously, 2020 saw a four-fold increase in ransom payments to cyber criminals, exceeding $400 million, with this sum primarily paid in cryptocurrency. As the threat posed by malicious cyber-actors continues to grow, so too must the vigilance of organizations that deal in crypto in various ways as the government's enforcement aspirations and capabilities concurrently expand. In the latest attempt to combat growing criminal activity in this area, on Oct. 6, 2021, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco of the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the formation of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET). The NCET's formation heralds a focus of enforcement resources towards the financial ecosystem that allows ransomware and similar threats to flourish. Simultaneously, the government has sought to increase private-sector reporting of cyber-attacks, and signaled that enforcement actions may be brought against companies that fail to report such attacks. Prudence dictates that any entity dealing with cryptocurrency stay abreast of rapidly developing regulatory and enforcement efforts in this space, and that victims of cyber-attacks remain equally vigilant.
The NCET's Creation Was Likely Prompted by Growing Cyber-Attack Threats. The increasingly frequent ransomware attacks on American companies, particularly those with a connection to critical infrastructure, are a likely impetus behind the NCET's creation. In the summer of 2021 alone, ransomware attacks disrupted oil supplies, threatened a major metropolitan police department, and imperiled one of the world's largest beef suppliers, among others. Recently, Deputy AG Monaco remarked that ransomware threats carry national security implications, and the government is focused on holding not only the hackers accountable, but the money launderers and cryptocurrency companies that make ransomware profitable. Ransomware hackers frequently demand, and often receive, payment in cryptocurrency. While it is not illegal to pay ransom in connection with ransomware attacks, the FBI has specifically stated that it does not support such payments because it does not guarantee the organization's data will be returned, and it encourages perpetrators. Overall, the FBI's views, combined with other agency's guidance, suggests that if payments are necessary companies should report the incident to allow law enforcement to investigate and stop the attackers. It appears that the government is weighing in more frequently on this issue, likely due to the increase in ransomware attacks.
Even prior to the NCET's formation, the government had already begun to crack down on cryptocurrency exchange entities that engagement in misconduct directly, but also those that fail to implement adequate compliance measures. In August 2021, a convertible virtual currency derivatives exchange was assessed a $100 million civil monetary penalty by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act based on its failure to implement an anti-money laundering and customer identification program, among other things. September 2021 saw the Treasury Department sanction a cryptocurrency exchange for facilitating financial transactions for ransomware actors. With the creation of the NCET, further prosecutions of this kind are likely.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe CFPB Is Digging In for Last Days of Biden's Term. But What Happens Next?
6 minute readNY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
4 minute read'Merciless' Filing Deadline Dooms Cuban Americans' Property-Trafficking Suit Against BNP Paribas, SocGen
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250