DOJ's Latest Attempt To Tame the Crypto-Creature: NCET
The formation of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team heralds a focus of enforcement resources towards the financial ecosystem that allows ransomware and similar threats to flourish.
December 06, 2021 at 11:00 AM
9 minute read
Financial Services and BankingGone are the days when cryptocurrency could remain largely ignored and safely relegated to a dark corner of the internet: Today, even telephone and mortgage companies are beginning to accept payments in cryptocurrency. Yet simultaneously, 2020 saw a four-fold increase in ransom payments to cyber criminals, exceeding $400 million, with this sum primarily paid in cryptocurrency. As the threat posed by malicious cyber-actors continues to grow, so too must the vigilance of organizations that deal in crypto in various ways as the government's enforcement aspirations and capabilities concurrently expand. In the latest attempt to combat growing criminal activity in this area, on Oct. 6, 2021, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco of the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the formation of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET). The NCET's formation heralds a focus of enforcement resources towards the financial ecosystem that allows ransomware and similar threats to flourish. Simultaneously, the government has sought to increase private-sector reporting of cyber-attacks, and signaled that enforcement actions may be brought against companies that fail to report such attacks. Prudence dictates that any entity dealing with cryptocurrency stay abreast of rapidly developing regulatory and enforcement efforts in this space, and that victims of cyber-attacks remain equally vigilant.
The NCET's Creation Was Likely Prompted by Growing Cyber-Attack Threats. The increasingly frequent ransomware attacks on American companies, particularly those with a connection to critical infrastructure, are a likely impetus behind the NCET's creation. In the summer of 2021 alone, ransomware attacks disrupted oil supplies, threatened a major metropolitan police department, and imperiled one of the world's largest beef suppliers, among others. Recently, Deputy AG Monaco remarked that ransomware threats carry national security implications, and the government is focused on holding not only the hackers accountable, but the money launderers and cryptocurrency companies that make ransomware profitable. Ransomware hackers frequently demand, and often receive, payment in cryptocurrency. While it is not illegal to pay ransom in connection with ransomware attacks, the FBI has specifically stated that it does not support such payments because it does not guarantee the organization's data will be returned, and it encourages perpetrators. Overall, the FBI's views, combined with other agency's guidance, suggests that if payments are necessary companies should report the incident to allow law enforcement to investigate and stop the attackers. It appears that the government is weighing in more frequently on this issue, likely due to the increase in ransomware attacks.
Even prior to the NCET's formation, the government had already begun to crack down on cryptocurrency exchange entities that engagement in misconduct directly, but also those that fail to implement adequate compliance measures. In August 2021, a convertible virtual currency derivatives exchange was assessed a $100 million civil monetary penalty by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act based on its failure to implement an anti-money laundering and customer identification program, among other things. September 2021 saw the Treasury Department sanction a cryptocurrency exchange for facilitating financial transactions for ransomware actors. With the creation of the NCET, further prosecutions of this kind are likely.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
SEC Issues $6.75M Fine Against Financial Firm Led by Trump's Choice to Lead Commerce Dept.
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.