Drafting an Arbitration Agreement in 2022: 2021 Considerations
This article briefly reiterates the key items that generally have been included in an arbitration agreement and then reflects on some of the newer matters to be considered.
December 10, 2021 at 11:00 AM
9 minute read
The events of the past couple years have forced us all to take a step back and rethink a broad array of matters that were previously on "auto pilot." Arbitration agreements are no exception. Obviously, the traditional features of a solid arbitration agreement remain unchanged for the most part. That being said, a number of new considerations are now de rigueur as practitioners embark on a drafting exercise that aims to not only secure clarity on the historically important matters but also take into account new realities and social priorities. Below I will briefly reiterate the key items that we've generally wanted to include in an arbitration agreement and then reflect on some of the newer matters to be considered.
The main objectives in drafting an arbitration clause are to reduce (if not eliminate) the risk that a dispute will be referred to a court at any point other than once enforcement of an arbitration award is sought, and to ensure that nothing in the agreement could lead a court to reject enforcement once an award is rendered. An arbitration agreement should therefore be clear in reflecting the parties' intent to resolve disputes in arbitration, specify its scope (i.e., the nature of disputes that must be resolved in arbitration) and include an agreement that judgment may be entered on the award. It should also indicate which procedural rules will govern the arbitration and ensure that the laws governing the arbitration agreement itself as well as the substance of the dispute are designated in the arbitration agreement if not otherwise included in the parties' contractual arrangement. Additionally, it will name the body that will oversee the administration of the arbitration and the actual seat of the arbitration. Finally, it should include the number of arbitrators to be appointed and the method for selecting them. In international arbitrations, parties should also specify the language in which proceedings will be held. These are the core items to include in an arbitration agreement. There are obviously other matters, such as whether arbitrators can award punitive damages and attorney fees, the scope and limits of discovery, consolidation and joinder, and similar items that a practitioner may want to consider including to tailor the arbitration agreement to the specific matter at hand.
In addition to the foregoing, today's drafters are more often than not called upon to reflect on matters related to the global events and social priorities of the past couple years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArtificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
9 minute readBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
7 minute readA Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
13 minute readTrending Stories
- 1In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 2Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 3Ex-Archegos CFO Gets 8-Year Prison Sentence for Fraud Scheme
- 4Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
- 5Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250