At least one judge sitting on a New York appellate panel on Wednesday appeared to credit the arguments of Harvey Weinstein’s attorneys, who argue that a juror in the disgraced movie mogul’s trial who was writing a novel about “predatory older men” should have been excused.
Weinstein is serving a 23-year prison sentence in a maximum-security prison after he was found guilty on criminal sexual act and third-degree rape charges. His attorneys are fighting to get the conviction reversed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
