Justices Considering Knowledge Requirement for Inaccurate Copyright Registrations
In this edition of their Intellectual Property Litigation, Eric Alan Stone and Catherine Nyarady report on 'Unicolors v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.', in which the U.S. Supreme Court is considering the standard by which an accused infringer must demonstrate that a copyright registrant knew of inaccuracies in a copyright registration. The outcome of this case may affect the ability of accused infringers to avoid liability by relying on inaccuracies in copyright registrations.
January 11, 2022 at 12:30 PM
8 minute read
The Copyright Act allows creators of original works of authorship to register their copyright claims with the U.S. Copyright Office. Although registration is not a precondition for copyright protection, registration is required before an infringement action can be brought, and knowing inaccuracies in a registration may be used by an accused infringer to invalidate a copyright. We report here on Unicolors v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., in which the U.S. Supreme Court is considering the standard by which an accused infringer must demonstrate that a copyright registrant knew of inaccuracies in a copyright registration. 959 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 2020), cert. granted, 141 S. Ct. 2698 (2021). The outcome of this case may affect the ability of accused infringers to avoid liability by relying on inaccuracies in copyright registrations.
Registration of Copyright Claims
To establish copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, a party alleging infringement must prove, among other things, that it owns a valid copyright. Feist Publ'ns v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991). A registration certificate issued by the U.S. Register of Copyrights "constitute[s] prima facie evidence of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate." 17 U.S.C. §410(c). In certain circumstances multiple works may be registered "as a single work," such as when the individual copyrightable works "are included in a single unit of publication." 37 C.F.R. §202.3(b)(4)(i)(A) (effective Jan. 24, 2011). Although registration is not required to receive copyright protection, 17 U.S.C. §408(a), the Copyright Act requires that copyright owners register their work before bringing an infringement action, id. §411(a).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArtificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
9 minute readBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
7 minute readA Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
13 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
- 2CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand
- 3X Faces Intense Scrutiny as EU Investigation Races to Conclusion & Looming Court Battle
- 4'Nation Is in Trouble': NY Lawmakers Advance Bill to Set Parameters for Shielding Juror IDs in Criminal Matters
- 5Margolis Edelstein Broadens Leadership With New Co-Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250