Landlord-Tenant—Harassment—Lack of Essential Services Did Not Constitute Harassment Since Landlord Attempted To Correct Conditions—However, Yelling at Tenants Family Did Constitute Harassment—Court Took Judicial Notice of Proven Efficacy of Mask Wearing To Limit Transmission of COVID-19—Lack of Mask Wearing, by Itself, Was Not Harassment Since "Intentionality" Was Not Geared Toward the Petitioners—Harassment Could Exist Where "Someone Was a Consistent Mask-Wearer" But Took the Mask Off To Threaten Someone Else—"Even a Wholesale Rejection of Masks, While Not Backed by Any Science or Common Sense or General Decorum, Was Not Proven To Target Petitioner Specifically"—"Therefore, Does Not Constitute Harassment"—Judicial Estoppel

A petitioner sought a finding of harassment and an order to correct repairs. The respondents had allegedly withheld "essential services" and engaged in "harassment behavior." The subject apartment had been surrendered, but with a "reservation for all claims against one another."

The building had three floors. A basement housed a preschool, the first floor housed a synagogue and the petitioners lived on the 2nd floor where there were two apartments.