Exploring the Many Benefits of E-Filing
Hector D. LaSalle, Presiding Justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department, writes: While adjusting to a new system naturally presents certain challenges to those used to the old system, electronic filing has provided our court with many benefits.
January 14, 2022 at 02:25 PM
5 minute read
Over the past two decades, electronic filing of court submissions has become increasingly utilized and made mandatory in courts throughout the state and nation. Electronic filing in the Appellate Division, Second Department, began in 2018 with cases originating in Westchester County. The program was gradually expanded over the course of three years until Kings County, the last and most populous county, was added effective April 1, 2021. Since that date, except for certain exempt attorneys and litigants, electronic filing of briefs, records, and motions has been mandatory in all matters originating and electronically filed in the Supreme and Surrogate's Courts in the 10 counties within the Second Department.
When a notice of appeal is filed in a matter that is subject to mandatory electronic filing, counsel for the appellant has 14 days to register with New York State Court Electronic Filing (NYSCEF) system or confirm a pre-existing registration and to enter information, including a copy of the notice of appeal with proof of filing and the order or judgment appealed from, in the NYSCEF system. Members of our Clerk's Office are notified of the filing and provide the filer with an Appellate Division docket number. The filer then has seven days to serve the respondents with a form containing that information, and to file proof of service electronically. Thereafter, the respondents have 20 days to register with NYSCEF or confirm registration and to enter certain information into the system. Once this is done, records, appendices, briefs, motions, and applications relating to that appeal are filed electronically, and service upon all parties other than those who are exempt shall be by electronic filing. Members of our Clerk's Office and Motion Support staffs review the electronic filings in the same fashion that they previously reviewed hard copy filings that came over the counter. Once the electronic filings have been accepted for filing by the court, the filer is notified. Litigants are encouraged to consult our court's website for more detailed information and guidance regarding electronic filing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Looking to the Future of the FDA and Its Impact on Drug Regulation in 2025
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250