Top Developments, Lessons and Reminders of 2021
2021 saw significant developments, lessons and reminders. In addition to the developments discussed below, important legislation was enacted in 2020, which became effective in 2021.
January 28, 2022 at 02:30 PM
18 minute read
2021 saw significant developments, lessons and reminders. In addition to the developments discussed below, important legislation was enacted in 2020, which became effective in 2021: New York's brand new post-mortem right of publicity, which grants to the heirs band executors of New York decedents the right to exploit the decedents' name and image; the Child-Parent Security Act, which revolutionized New York law in the third-party reproductive context by legally establishing a child's relationship to their parents where the child is conceived through assisted reproduction; and final revisions to the Power of Attorney form. Since those developments were included in the Top 10 Developments, Lessons and Reminders of 2020 (NYLJ, Jan. 22, 2021), they are not repeated here but please refer to that article for a full discussion of those important developments.
12. Assets Acquired After Death Pass by Intestacy, Not Will. In the Estate of Keough, 150 N.Y.S.3d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021), the Appellate Division determined that assets acquired by a testator's estate after the testator's death pass pursuant to the laws of intestacy and not the terms of the decedent's will. The decedent was the wife of one of the hostages held captive in Iran beginning in 1979. After they both died, Congress enacted legislation to provide compensation to former hostages and their family members, or if deceased to their personal representatives. In concluding that testators may not dispose by will of property that is not owned by them at the time of death, the court looked to Estates, Powers & Trusts Law (EPTL) §3-3.1, which provides that a devise of all property will pass all property a testator was entitled to dispose of at the time of death. According to the court, a testator lacks testamentary capacity to dispose of assets not owned by them at the time of death because they could not have known the nature and extent of that property. As a result, the after-acquired property passed from the decedent's estate to a distributee brother and not the residuary beneficiary under the decedent's will. A legislative amendment may be necessary to ensure that after-acquired property passes in accordance with the decedent's intent.
11. Duplicate Charitable Filings Removed and Donor Anonymity Protected. Charitable entities organized, operating or fundraising in New York state are required to file an annual financial report with the Attorney General's Charities Bureau. Amendments to New York law (N.Y. Executive Law §172-b), which became effective on Jan. 1, 2021, imposed an additional requirement to make the same filing with the New York Department of State (DOS). A law enacted on Nov. 12, 2021 (A.1141/S.4817) removes the extra filing requirement with the DOS, which was duplicative and burdensome for not-for-profits. In Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, 141 S.Ct. 2373 (2021), the Supreme Court held that California's requirement for charities to file donor information (collected on IRS Form 990 Schedule B) with the state attorney general is unconstitutional. Following that holding, the New York Attorney General suspended its collection of Schedule B. As of July 30, 2021, public charities' annual filings will no longer require disclosure information that identifies donors. The law enacted on Nov. 12 also requires the Attorney General to keep donor information confidential.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFalling Back in Love With Certain Estate Planning Strategies in a Falling Interest Rate Environment
9 minute readNavigating the Corporate Transparency and New York LLC Transparency Acts: A Guide for Trust and Estates Attorneys
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250