Affirmative Defense Forfeited; Relevant Market Definition Held Insufficient

In their Northern District Roundup column, Adam Shaw and Jenna Smith discuss two recent noteworthy decisions: 'Salamone v. Douglas Marine,' where Judge Mae D'Agostino addressed some of the procedural peculiarities of personal jurisdiction; and 'Singh v. American Racing-Tioga Downs,' where Judge Lawrence Kahn revisited the particularity required to allege a relevant market for antitrust claims.

February 10, 2022 at 11:00 AM

7 minute read

Civil Procedure

Adam R. Shaw

Jenna C. Smith

This column addresses recent noteworthy decisions of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. Recently, District Judge Mae D'Agostino addressed some of the procedural peculiarities of personal jurisdiction and Senior District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn revisited the particularity required to allege a relevant market for antitrust claims.