A few weeks ago, the law firm Cooley garnered national press and praise for refusing to cave to their client Tesla’s demand that Cooley fire an associate attorney who had previously worked at the SEC. See Debra Cassens Weiss, Cooley is praised for refusing to fire associate disliked by Elon Musk because of past SEC work, ABA Journal (Jan. 19, 2022); Staci Zaretsky, This Biglaw Partner Would’ve Told Elon Musk To Kindly GTFO for Demanding an Associate Be Fired, Above the Law (Jan. 19, 2022). The praise was widespread. The numerous articles on the isolated incident caught my attention because the groundswell of support for Cooley conflicts with its obligations to maintain client secrets.

The praise heaped on Cooley for its steadfast refusal to fire an associate on demand by Elon Musk seems at once both overdone and half-baked.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]