doctor measures the pressure of a patient with a headacheRecent appellate division decisions have made it abundantly clear that the medical malpractice doctrine of lost chance of a better outcome is an accepted basis for recovery of substantial damages. In cases involving delayed diagnosis or omission failures qualified expert testimony based on the evidence addressing each of the various departures as a proximate cause of or substantial factor in causing the lost chance or increased injury is part and parcel of plaintiff’s prima facie case. Examining the case law on this doctrine will help counsel craft the requisite medical expert opinion questions and present appropriate jury charges as well as prepare for jury voir dire.

Recently, the Second Department upheld a multimillion-dollar verdict based upon delayed diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Bacchus-Sirju v. Hollis Women’s Ctr., 196 A.D.3d 670 (2d Dep’t 2021). The court upheld the jury’s verdict finding plaintiff’s expert’s testimony sufficient and supported by the evidence that the alleged departures in failing to inform the decedent that her sonogram showed fluid in the cul-de-sac, failure to obtain a blood CEA and refer to a gynecologic oncologist more likely than not were a substantial factor in causing a delayed diagnosis of ovarian cancer and diminishing her chances for a better outcome. Specifically, in discussing proximate cause, the court held: “In order to establish proximate causation, a plaintiff must present sufficient medical evidence from which a reasonable person might conclude that it was more probable than not that the defendant’s departure was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s injury (see Berger v. Shen, 185 A.D.3d at 541; Gaspard v. Aronoff, 153 A.D.3d at 796). A plaintiff’s evidence of proximate causation ‘may be found legally sufficient … as long as evidence is presented from which the jury may infer that the defendant’s conduct diminished the plaintiff’s chance of a better outcome or increased the injury.’”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]