Second Circuit Rebukes LIBOR Prosecution Theory
The latest court battle involving an individual, 'United States v. Connolly', ended in a noteworthy rebuke of the government's fraud theory and serves as a reminder that conduct a prosecutor might think is "wrong" does not necessarily violate a federal fraud statute.
March 02, 2022 at 12:15 PM
14 minute read
Since the 2008 financial crisis, there has been public outcry for the prosecution of individuals perceived to have manipulated the financial markets for their benefit and to the detriment of the public. Several years later, when news outlets began reporting on the LIBOR submission scandal, the outcry for individual prosecutions escalated, and the government launched global investigations resulting in settled cases involving large banks and multiple prosecutions of individuals who allegedly manipulated LIBOR submissions to benefit their institutions. Ultimately, the government's LIBOR prosecutions resulted in a mixed bag, with notable convictions but also acquittals in cases in the United States and the United Kingdom. The latest court battle involving an individual, United States v. Connolly, ended in a noteworthy rebuke of the government's fraud theory and serves as a reminder that conduct a prosecutor might think is "wrong" does not necessarily violate a federal fraud statute.
The Investigations and Prosecutions
The LIBOR investigations resulted in what were then some of the largest financial settlements of the time. In 2012, Barclays settled LIBOR charges for $453 million and UBS settled for $1.5 billion. In 2013, Société Générale paid €228 million (and $860 million again in 2018 alongside bribery charges), ICAP paid $87 million, Rabobank over $1 billion, RBS $615 million, JP Morgan €80 million, and Citigroup €70 million. In 2014, Lloyd's paid $370 million, and in 2015 Deutsche Bank paid $2.5 billion. In addition to these examples, other settlements were reached with institutions for different aspects of the LIBOR scandal. Because none of the banks went to trial, the government was able to tout the large settlements as a fulfilment of promises to get tough on corporate crime. Barclays paying $453 million to settle Libor probe, Reuters (June 27, 2012); UBS traders charged, bank fined $1.5 billion in Libor scandal, Reuters (Dec. 18, 2012); RBS slapped with second largest penalty in Libor rate-rigging scandal, Bloomberg News (Feb. 6, 2013); ICAP fined $87 million over Libor, three former staff charged, Reuters (Sept. 25, 2013); Rabobank Admits Wrongdoing in Libor Investigation, Agrees To Pay $325 Million Criminal Penalty, DOJ Press Release (Oct. 29, 2013); Antitrust: Commission fines banks € 1.49 billion for participating in cartels in the interest rate derivatives industry, European Commission Press Release (Dec. 4, 2013); Lloyds Banking Group Admits Wrongdoing in LIBOR Investigation, Agrees to Pay $86 Million Criminal Penalty, DOJ Press Release (July 28, 2014); Deutsche Bank's London Subsidiary Agrees to Plead Guilty in Connection With Long-Running Manipulation of LIBOR, DOJ Press Release (April 23, 2015).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
9 minute readTortious Interference With a Contract; Retaliatory Eviction Defense; Illegal Lockout: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Optimizing Legal Services: The Shift Toward Digital Document Centers
- 2Charlie Javice Fraud Trial Delayed as Judge Denies Motion to Sever
- 3Holland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
- 4With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Attorneys See Potential for Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 5Trump Signs Executive Order Creating Strategic Digital Asset Reserve
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250