The Metaverse Is Not Just Business as Usual: Cybersecurity, Privacy and Other Legal Issues a Traditional Business Must Consider for Digital Operations
Suffice to say, the metaverse is new component for businesses and governments to consider. But what are some of the legal implications of the wide array of applications to the metaverse?
March 14, 2022 at 12:30 PM
8 minute read
Metaverse technologies are inescapable in today's markets. J.P Morgan recently described the metaverse as "a seamless convergence of our physical and digital lives, creating a unified, virtual community where we can work, play, relax, transact and socialize." Meta, formerly known as Facebook, is one very reason metaverses have been in the spotlight. Meta is just one company that has embraced virtual reality as a future technology by offering users access to the metaverse, particularly their metaverse, Horizon World. Despite the term's growing popularity in the media, many people are unaware about what a "metaverse" actually is. According to Oxford Languages, Google's English Dictionary, a metaverse is a virtual-reality space in which users can interact with a computer-generated environment and other users. Mark Zuckerberg described Metaverse as the next iteration of the mobile web. The metaverse and blockchain technology are the fuel behind the term Web3, which many believe to be the evolution of today's internet.
Metaverses are not a new technology. In fact, they date back approximately 30 years. Today's popularity is largely based upon new blockchain technology that has enabled the development of decentralized metaverses. Traditionally, metaverses were built and controlled by a single entity—examples of prominent centralized metaverses are Roblox and Meta's Horizon World—whereas today metaverses such as Decentraland or Portals are built on blockchains such as Ethereum or Solana. Blockchains utilize a smart contract to record transactions in the metaverse, thereby recording in a concrete ledger the transactions that unfold in the metaverse on the respective blockchain. (Smart contracts are computer programs (collection of codes) stored on a blockchain that run when predetermined conditions are met. They typically are used to automate the execution of an agreement so that all participants can be immediately certain of the outcome, without any intermediary's involvement or time loss.) The Decentraland whitepaper describes their metaverse as a decentralized community with no single agent with the power to modify the rules of the software, contents of land, economics of the currency, or prevent others from accessing the world. Moreover, recent enhancements in virtual reality and augmented reality have brought these metaverses to life. The Oculus virtual reality headset transports users into a three-dimensional metaverse.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
Courts Beginning to Set Standards for Evidence Relying Upon Artificial Intelligence
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250