The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Thursday that federal judges cannot point to a longstanding legal doctrine to abstain from deciding questions that arise out of certain state probate proceedings.

The ruling, from a unanimous panel of the Manhattan-based appeals court, enforced the narrow scope of the Younger abstention doctrine, a limited carve-out to the general rule that federal courts must hear cases within their jurisdiction.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]