No one likes to think they may have to go to trial, especially in a family matter. The fact is that most family cases resolve amicably. Of those that don't settle by agreement and go to trial, many involve issues of domestic violence and/or child abuse. Domestic abuse and child abuse are co-morbid. In other words, even after the adult parties separate due to interpersonal violence, there is a strong connection between perpetrators who batter their partners and those who abuse their children. Therefore, any and all potential evidence should be maintained, organized and useful for trial.
Children are also known to suffer from the battering of their parent even when they themselves are not physically injured. Therefore, in cases involving domestic violence, while not inevitable, a trial is more likely and child protection may be at the heart of the trial. Accordingly, detailed preparation is critical, especially for victims where there are children in need of protection. Attorneys need to be prepared, and they must prepare their clients. Documentary evidence assists the trier of fact. It can shine a light on the credibility of the victim and therefore the child's need for protection. In doing so, it can also cast doubt on the credibility of the abuser.
Trial preparation begins with knowing the victim client's detailed relationship history with their adult abusive partner. The client should write the history of the relationship, describing not only the physical violence, but what incidents or behaviors lead up to the violence regarding each incident. This history should go back to the relationship before the marriage as that is often where coercion and threats begin even before physical violence has been used as a means of control. In cases of emotional abuse without physical violence, the history should also be written. Details such as name calling, humiliation, labeling followed by apologizing, and gas-lighting behaviors, as well as how an argument started, are important to contextualize events. That history is a critical guide. It is a guide for pretrial and a guide for a trial where the well-being of children is at issue. That evidence is the telling of the story of how the violence began, escalated, continued, and why the matter requires a court to intervene and protect.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDetermining 'Molineux' Issues in Civil and Criminal Actions: A Suggested Approach
12 minute readDefense Counsel Can't Use Unrelated Lawsuit to Impeach Expert Witness Testimony, Judge Rules
What You Need to Know About New York Commercial Division Rule 13(c)
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Who Got The Work
Lane Powell shareholder Pilar C. French has entered an appearance for Penney OpCo LLC in a pending consumer class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 26 in Oregon District Court by Hattis & Lukacs, alleges that the company markets fictional discounts for certain products. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, is 6:24-cv-01414, Gamble v. Penney OpCo LLC.
Who Got The Work
Donald L. Carmelite and Coryn D. Hubbert of Marshall Dennehey have stepped in to defend the City of York, Detective Roland Comacho and Detective Lisa Daniels in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Middle District Court by Levin & Zeiger on behalf of Noel Matos Montalvo, seeks damages for the amount of time that Montalvo was incarcerated over five years for the exonerated killing of his common law wife. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson, is 1:24-cv-01459, Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
Who Got The Work
Joseph M. Englert, Brian E. Pumphrey and M. Laughlin Allen of McGuireWoods have entered appearances for Bank of America NA in a pending class action. The action was filed Aug. 26 in Georgia Northern District Court by Podhurst Orseck; Webb, Klase & Lemond; Crabtree & Auslander; and Morrison + Associates on behalf of the representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, a trust which contains residential real property. The suit accuses the defendant of overcharging the trust by selecting unnecessary and/or excessively priced insurance for the property. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr., is 1:24-cv-03780, Weinraub v. Bank of America, N.A.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250