This decision involved in action for a declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction. The plaintiff, a commercial tenant, moved for a Yellowstone injunction “tolling the period within which to cure the breach of the lease between the parties.” The landlord had served a Notice to Cure dated Oct. 28, 2021.

The tenant alleged that because it was “diligently attempting to cure the breach in question, the lapse of insurance coverage required by the lease—a Yellowstone injunction is warranted to preserve the status quo, namely, its valuable leasehold.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]