Transferring Personal Data From Europe and Switzerland to the U.S.: Where Are We Now?
On March 25, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden and European Commission (EC) President Ursula von der Leyen jointly announced an agreement in principle for a new Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework (Framework) that has the potential to establish the rules of European to U.S. data transfer.
May 06, 2022 at 02:30 PM
8 minute read
Whether your business is multinational or not, it's likely that at some point information containing personal data will need to be transferred from Europe or Switzerland to the United States. Personal data is defined broadly to include any information which is related to an identified or identifiable natural person. For instance, a U.S.-based online business which is collecting or processing names, addresses, and credit card information to fulfill orders for its products from European or Swiss persons must be familiar with the rules governing cross-border transfer. The same applies to a U.S.-based service business which is collecting or processing names and health information to track outbreaks of COVID-19 globally.
Over the last 20 years, there have been two government approved frameworks implemented to control data transfer, namely the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework (Safe Harbor) and Privacy Shield. Both were invalidated by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) based on lawsuits brought by Maximilian Schrems. On March 25, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden and European Commission (EC) President Ursula von der Leyen jointly announced an agreement in principle for a new Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework (Framework) that has the potential to establish the rules of European to U.S. data transfer.
What Is the New Framework?
While not many details are currently available, the Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework will include a multilayered redress mechanism for EU citizens to file complaints with a Data Protection Review Court containing non-U.S. government members with the authority to "adjudicate claims and direct remedial measures as needed," as noted in the White House release. Procedures will be followed by U.S. intelligence agencies to "ensure effective oversight of new privacy and civil liberties standards." The next step is for the EC to draft an adequacy determination for the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) to review. Then the EDPB will issue a non-binding opinion, and the EC will request approval of a committee of representatives from member states.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNYAG’s Enforcement of Mandated Cybersecurity Safeguards Sends Expensive Shock Waves through Varying Industries
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250