Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney speaks on legislation that would reinstate the use of familial DNA to solve cold cases involving homicides, sex offenses, kidnapping, arson and acts of terrorism at the capitol building in Albany, New York, on May 10, 2022. A Manhattan appellate division banned use of familial DNA last week. Photo: Sen. Phil Boyle's Office/Richard Turoski Long Island DA Asks Lawmakers to Reinstate Use of Familial DNA in Solving Cold Cases
Suffolk County DA Ray Tierney said he didn't see infringement of Fourth Amendment rights "as long as you've done the proper investigative steps."
May 10, 2022 at 04:04 PM
5 minute read
Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney speaks on legislation that would reinstate the use of familial DNA to solve cold cases involving homicides, sex offenses, kidnapping, arson and acts of terrorism at the capitol building in Albany, New York, on May 10, 2022. A Manhattan appellate division banned use of familial DNA last week. Photo: Sen. Phil Boyle's Office/Richard Turoski
A first-year district attorney from Long Island struck back on Tuesday against a New York appellate court decision banning the use of publicly available DNA of a suspect's blood relative in efforts to solve cold cases of violent felonies.
As the legislative session adjourns June 2, Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney, an independent elected in 2021, joined a Republican-backed bid in the Capitol Building to reinstate familial DNA searches to solve violent crimes—specifically homicides, sex offenses, kidnapping, arson and acts of terrorism—by using genetics of a blood relative such as a sibling, child or parent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Hochul Vetoes Bill Meant to Alleviate Public Notaries' Paperwork in Non-Electronic Acts
Appealability of Prejudgment Orders: CPLR 5512, Court of Appeals, Legislative Intent
10 minute read
Many Americans Don't Trust the Supreme Court This Election; David Boies Isn't One of Them
NY Top Court Punts Certified Foreclosure Question Back to 2nd Circuit
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Freshfields Hires SEC Associate Director in Latest D.C. Lateral Hiring Spree
- 2Jury Finds Dentons, Ex-Partner Beats Malpractice Claim Over $54 Million Currency Deal
- 3Former Cahill Executive Committee Member, Leveraged Finance Pioneer Dies at 67
- 4State Attorney General Faces Federal Courtroom Test Over Crypto Mining Ban
- 5The Corporate Transparency Act: One Year Later With Deadline Looming
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
