'Gray v. Hudson' Rules on Copyrightability of Musical Elements
The decision articulates the current state of Ninth Circuit law regarding the threshold of protectable originality in music infringement cases, and because so many music cases are brought in the Ninth Circuit the ruling will likely be significant to music litigators nationwide.
May 19, 2022 at 12:00 PM
9 minute read
CopyrightsOn March 10, 2022 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a District Court's vacatur of a jury verdict in Gray v. Hudson, 28 F.4th 87 (9th Cir. 2022), to rule that a repeating eight-note instrumental pattern in Katy Perry's 2013 hit "Dark Horse" did not infringe two similar patterns in plaintiff's 2008 composition titled "Joyful Noise." The decision articulates the current state of Ninth Circuit law regarding the threshold of protectable originality in music infringement cases, and because so many music cases are brought in the Ninth Circuit the ruling will likely be significant to music litigators nationwide.
|Background
In 2007, plaintiff Chike Ojukwu composed a simple melody using a free music website, and sold it to plaintiff Marcus Gray, who used Ojukwu's melody as a repeating instrumental figure, or "ostinato," in a 2008 recording of Joyful Noise. The Gray work was released on a 2008 album that drew millions of views on Myspace and YouTube, and was nominated in 2009 for a Grammy award for "Best Rock or Rap Gospel Album." Defendants, including Katheryn Hudson p/k/a Katy Perry (collectively, Perry), created the allegedly infringing work in 2013 after a meeting in which they reviewed "several short musical fragments to consider using in a new song." The Perry work was extremely successful and resulted in a popular music video and a Super Bowl halftime performance for Perry.
Plaintiffs (collectively, Gray) brought suit in November 2016 and proceeded to a biufurcated jury trial in 2019. With respect to liability, plaintiffs lacked direct evidence that Perry had copied from the Gray work, but relied on circumstantial evidence that Perry had a reasonable opportunity to have heard the work, coupled with the alleged substantial similarity of the ostinatos in the two songs. The latter point was addressed primarily through expert testimony, with Gray's expert opining that "no one single … element" of similarity was substantial in isolation, but taken together the ostinatos were substantially similar. Perry's expert disagreed, pointing to the use of different ending notes by the parties' respective patterns, and to the existence of similar overall patterns in several well-known songs including "Merrily We Roll Along" and "Jolly Old Saint Nicholas."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Asked to Review Issues of Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement
8 minute read'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250