On April 21, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC, No. 20-1029 (U.S. April 21, 2022), a case involving a First Amendment challenge to an Austin, Texas, ordinance that regulated on-premises and off-premises signs differently. The Austin case would have been significant even without considering the specific issues it raised because land use disputes rarely reach the court.
The substance of the litigation, however, has quite important practical implications for local governments in New York and, indeed, throughout the country. If the court had decided to uphold the underlying decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, municipalities very likely would have been obligated to amend their ordinances and local codes governing on-premises and off-premises signs—a complicated subject that typically involves studies, administrative and executive time, public hearings and associated attorney fees and other costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]