Next Stop: Will the Luxembourg Rail Protocol Finally Arrive?
Two recent events occurring within six months of each other have suggested the Luxembourg Rail Protocol may be gaining steam.
June 01, 2022 at 01:30 PM
8 minute read
Practitioners involved in aircraft financings are likely to be familiar with the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment, more commonly known as the "Cape Town Convention." The Cape Town Convention (the Convention) is an international trade convention sponsored by UNIDROIT (the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law), that was adopted in 2001 and is designed to create a multijurisdictional system of enforceable rights in mobile equipment. The reason aircraft financiers are generally knowledgeable about the Convention is because its first protocol (or supplement) was the "Protocol on Matters Specific to Aircraft" (the Aircraft Protocol). The Aircraft Protocol, which entered into force in contracting states in March 2006, now has more than 80 contracting countries and an international electronic registry that has handled hundreds of thousands of registrations.
In April 2017, this column discussed the second protocol to the Cape Town Convention, namely the Luxembourg Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters Specific to Railway Rolling Stock (The Luxembourg Rail Protocol Steams Ahead, 65 N.Y.L.J. 257 (April 6, 2017)). The Luxembourg Rail Protocol (the Protocol), as it is generally known, which was signed on Feb. 23, 2007 in Luxembourg, aims to provide a multijurisdictional system of enforceable security interests in railway rolling stock, analogous to the system operating for aircraft under the Aircraft Protocol. This requires each item of rolling stock to be uniquely and permanently identified, but there is currently no global system for uniquely identifying rolling stock, whereas airframes and aircraft engines are uniquely identifiable through their manufacturer, model and serial number. Accordingly, an additional feature of the Luxembourg Rail Protocol is that it necessarily facilitates a new global unique numbering system—URVIS (Unique Rail Vehicle Identification System)—where an URVIS number will be allocated by the international registry and then permanently fixed to rolling stock. Rules on how the number is affixed are currently being developed by the UN.
The Protocol system for registering and recognizing interests in railway rolling stock includes the rights of secured creditors, lessors under leasing agreements, and equipment vendors under conditional sale agreements and other title reservation agreements. It accomplishes this through URVIS. URVIS would allow each item of rolling stock to be uniquely and permanently identified by a 16 digit number, and would be accompanied by an easily consultable registry. This international registry, once established, would be Internet-accessible and enable simplified filing of interests recognized by all contracting states. It would provide notice to third parties, and also establish priority as between registered, and unregistered or subsequently registered, claimants.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250