![MRI scan of the head and brain. Photo: jalisko/Adobe Stock](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2022/06/AdobeStock_210175751-767x633.jpg)
The Acoustic Neuroma Anomaly: The Need for a Legislative Fix to an Unintended Consequence of Lavern's Law in Cases Involving a Failure To Diagnose Non-Cancerous or Benign Tumors
As it stands today, and as it is unlikely to change without an act of the state legislature, a plaintiff who is the victim of blatant medical malpractice but does not become aware of it until after two-and-a-half years from the initial treatment date, will not have any recourse if the condition is not either cancer or a malignant tumor.
June 08, 2022 at 11:00 AM
9 minute read
Imagine you wake up one morning with a pounding migraine headache. You go to the doctor and the doctor orders an MRI. The results come back, and the doctor tells you that there are no abnormal findings in the MRI, and you have a clean bill of health. Over the next three years your migraines grow increasingly worse. Soon, some of your cognitive functions decline. You go to see a new doctor, who orders a new MRI, and the scan shows a large mass that has been growing in your brain for the last four years. After a battery of tests, it is determined that the mass is benign, and you do not have cancer. You are somewhat relieved, but are still in pain, because the mass is causing your severe migraines, and it has caused irreparable damage to your sight and hearing. You find out that the initial scan done three years before clearly showed the growth, and the first doctor failed to diagnose it. You contact an attorney to sue the first doctor, but the attorney tells you that your statute of limitations has run out, because you only had two-and-a-half years from when the doctor failed to diagnose your tumor to file a lawsuit. You do some googling and come back to the attorney and ask, "What about Lavern's Law, the new law passed in 2018, which extended the statute of limitations to two-and-a-half years from the date you discover the injury?" The attorney tells you that unfortunately Lavern's Law only applies to malignant tumors and cancer. Because your tumor is benign and non-cancerous, you are unable to recover anything.
If this sounds like a horror story to you, we assure you it is not. This in fact is a very real scenario, that our law firm has played out several times over the past few years. This is the current state of the law in New York, and it must change.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Failure to Adequately Inform Patients Failure to Adequately Inform Patients](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7a/20/5535f4b8463ca0100e751a370833/moore-thomas-a-767x633.jpg)
![Judicial Admissions and Medical Malpractice Defense Judicial Admissions and Medical Malpractice Defense](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/11/John-Lyddane-767x633.jpg)
![Confusion Over Jury's $20M Med Mal Verdict Causes Courthouse Stir Confusion Over Jury's $20M Med Mal Verdict Causes Courthouse Stir](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/da/df/bd638d994312bf054edded06ebe3/nassau-county-supreme-court-1-121809-767x633.jpg)
![CPLR Article 16 Apportionment And Dismissed Defendants Medical Malpractice CPLR Article 16 Apportionment And Dismissed Defendants Medical Malpractice](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7a/20/5535f4b8463ca0100e751a370833/moore-thomas-a-767x633.jpg)
CPLR Article 16 Apportionment And Dismissed Defendants Medical Malpractice
14 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250