Cryptocurrency Crime: Examining Age-Old Fraud With a Modern Twist
Practitioners and investors need to keep apprised of the rapid developments in cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency may be the wave of the future, but as with any new technology, wrinkles need to be ironed out and the law needs to evolve up.
June 24, 2022 at 02:00 PM
8 minute read
As cryptocurrency has become a ubiquitous part of modern finance, so too has it become the latest tool for criminals. While this new currency may seem disorienting to newcomers who are still grappling with the underlying technology, the crimes surrounding cryptocurrency are as basic as they come. Most fraudulent cryptocurrency schemes bear a striking resemblance to conventional frauds with which society is all too familiar, from Ponzi schemes, to investment scams, to basic theft. Where we used to see bank robberies, now we see hacking of crypto wallets and exchanges. In 2021 alone, crypto fraudsters absconded with over $14 billion worth of cryptocurrency, up from $7.8 billion in 2020. See MacKenzie Sigalos, Crypto scammers took a record $14 billion in 2021, CNBC.com (Jan. 6, 2022). But as described by Newton's Third Law of Motion, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Law enforcement has responded to the rising incidence of fraud by increasing resources to prosecute cryptocurrency scams, and regulators are similarly focused on imposing regulations to curb the fraud and protect investors. While investigating and prosecuting such crime presents obstacles as the law and enforcement technology races to catch up, novel technologies are increasingly allowing investigators to overcome the pseudonymous nature of cryptocurrency.
Modern Cryptocurrency Frauds Take Several Forms, but Frequently Resemble Conventional Frauds. Cryptocurrency frauds often differ little from conventional frauds, aside from the type of assets involved. Some cryptocurrency fraudsters operate what are essentially classic Ponzi schemes. For example, in February 2022, the founder of cryptocurrency platform BitConnect was indicted for allegedly operating a "global Ponzi scheme" where early BitConnect investors were paid "with money from later investors." See BitConnect Founder Indicted in Global $2.4 Billion Cryptocurrency Scheme, DOJ (Feb. 25, 2022). Similarly, QuadrigaCX, a Canadian cryptocurrency exchange, collapsed due to a massive fraud perpetrated by the now deceased CEO. See AquadrigaCX, A Review by Staff of the Ontario Securities Commission. The Ontario Securities Commission found that the exchange was essentially a Ponzi scheme and called it "an old-fashioned fraud wrapped in modern technology." Id.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readMenendez Asks US Judge for Bond Pending Appeal of Criminal Conviction
Jona Rechnitz Sentencing in Federal Court Is Postponed to June
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250