Application of Surrogate's Court Rules in Wrongful Death Actions
This article focuses on the rules of estate administration in the Surrogate's Courts that are applicable in situations that are fairly common for New York City personal injury lawyers.
July 29, 2022 at 11:00 AM
11 minute read
This article focuses on the rules of estate administration in the Surrogate's Courts that are applicable in situations that are fairly common for New York City personal injury lawyers. It can be described as follows: Your client is the unmarried mother of several minor children, all born in New York City. The father of the children (the Decedent) tragically has been killed in an automobile accident in New York City. The Decedent never established his paternity of his children in family court but lived with the mother continuously for the entire lives of his children. The Decedent is originally from somewhere in Central America, perhaps Mexico, and crossed into the United States somewhere near San Diego or El Paso. He worked successfully for cash as a day laborer and never filed income tax returns. He, together with the earnings of the mother who cleans houses also for cash, provided for the family in a fairly meager manner. New York being a sanctuary city, there was no need to obtain any governmental approval or interaction beyond the voluntary application by the mother of the children for public assistance, which she receives. Little is known about the family relationships of Decedent beyond his children and their mother, perhaps due to the firm reticence of the mother to talk about immigration status. The Decedent never created a will or any other legal documents to transmit his "estate", which amounts to cash and little else of monetary value. Each birth certificate of the minor children lists the Decedent as "Father". The automobile accident involved a taxi cab whose maximum liability coverage is $75,000.
The mother hires personal injury attorneys (PI Lawyer) in order to bring on the lawsuit against the cab company. The wrongful death case seems strong because the Decedent was struck while a pedestrian in a cross walk with a green light in his favor. The insurance company has already signaled that an offer of the policy is likely. The recovery would go to the heirs of the Decedent or as New York describes them, the "distributees". EPTL §4-1.1. In this case, since the mother is not a spouse of the decedent, the closest living distributees are the minor children of the Decedent. PI Lawyer first discovers that an Administrator of the estate of the Decedent is required to bring on the wrongful death lawsuit, which must be brought within two years of the date of death. EPTL §5-4.1 provides in part:
"The personal representative, duly appointed in this state or any other jurisdiction, of a decedent who is survived by distributees may maintain an action to recover damages for a wrongful act, neglect or default which caused the decedent's death against a person who would have been liable to the decedent by reason of such wrongful conduct if death had not ensued. Such action must be commenced within two years after the decedent's death …"
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250