In People v. Deverow, 2022 N.Y. Slip Op 03362 (May 24, 2022), a unanimous Court of Appeals has underscored the principle that, under certain circumstances, a court’s discretion can be limited by a defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense. The Court held that the trial court’s evidentiary rulings deprived the defendant of a meaningful opportunity to present evidence in support of his justification defense. Further, the Court reminded trial courts that, in some instances, the rules of evidence must yield to a defendant’s right to present a defense.

The right to present a defense was articulated by the Supreme Court most recently in Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006). The Court, quoting Krane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 690 (1986), held: “‘Whether rooted directly in the Due Process Clause or in the Compulsory Clause of the Sixth Amendment, the constitution guarantees criminal defendants a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.’”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]