Hayley Paige Lawsuit Teaches Us That Non-Competes Are Still Enforceable in New York Particularly Where the Employee's Services Are Special or Unique
This article discusses the viability of restrictive covenants under New York law, and the relevant factors analyzed by the courts in enjoining Hayley Paige Gutman's activities and competition with JLM Couture.
August 05, 2022 at 11:00 AM
9 minute read
Hayley Paige Gutman is well known as a bridal designer for her feminine yet playful wedding dress designs and related apparel, which have been regularly featured on TLC's "Say Yes To The Dress." For over a year and a half, Gutman has been embroiled in a bitter and publicized legal battle with her now former employer and bridal design and fashion company, JLM Couture. JLM sued Gutman for alleged breaches of Gutman's employment agreement, stemming from, among other things, Gutman's attempts to use her name to promote non-JLM brands during her employment with JLM, and personal use of social-media accounts to promote third-party products. In this article, we discuss the viability of restrictive covenants under New York law, and the relevant factors analyzed by the courts in enjoining Gutman's activities and competition with JLM.
|Non-Compete Agreements Remain Enforceable Under New York Law
In 2011, when Gutman was 25 years old and relatively new to the fashion industry, she was hired by JLM as a designer of wedding and bridesmaid dresses. Gutman signed an employment agreement with JLM for a fixed term, which contained, among other things, certain confidentiality, proprietary rights, trade secret and non-compete provisions. Specifically, Gutman agreed that she would not compete with JLM, directly or indirectly, during the term of the employment agreement (July 13, 2011 which was extended through Aug. 1, 2022 (the term)), by engaging in or associating with any person, organization or enterprise that engages in the manufacture or sale of goods within JLM's business (the non-compete agreement). She also agreed to grant JLM "the exclusive world-wide right and license to use her name" during the term plus two years thereafter ("Designer's Name" defined as "'Hayley,' 'Paige,' 'Hayley Paige Gutman,' 'Hayley Gutman,' 'Hayley Paige,' or any derivative thereof"), in connection with "the design, manufacture, marketing and/or sale of bridal clothing, bridal accessories and related bridal and wedding items," including the right to register such name as trademark(s). Gutman further agreed that, in the event she breached any provision of her employment agreement, JLM would be entitled to injunctive relief.
While employed by JLM, Gutman became a household name in the bridal industry in part through her social media presence and activity on eight social media accounts created both before and after her employment with JLM under the "Miss Hayley Paige" handle or web address on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Instagram, Snapchat, Spotify and TikTok. The Instagram account, in particular, which was opened during her employment with JLM and managed jointly by Gutman and JLM's chief executive officer, contains a combination of JLM Hayley Paige brand promotional posts as well as personal posts, such as of Gutman and her dog, Winnie, and has over a million followers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
8 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250