statute of limitationsIn United States v. Pikus, 39 F.4th 39 (2d Cir. 2022), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit once again considered the extent to which a multi-year delay from a defendant’s indictment to trial is permissible under the Speedy Trial Act. Senior District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York Jed Rakoff, sitting by designation on the Second Circuit, authored the unanimous opinion of the panel, in which Circuit Judges Michael Park and Beth Robinson joined. The Second Circuit held that the district court erred in denying the defendant’s multiple motions to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the three-year delay from his arrest to trial violated the Speedy Trial Act and that the district court judge failed to issue sufficient factual findings to justify the delay. The court’s decision in Pikus is the most recent entry in a line of decisions where the Second Circuit has strictly enforced the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act.

The Speedy Trial Act

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides, among other things, that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.” The Speedy Trial Act implements this constitutional right for federally-charged defendants by requiring the government to file an information or indictment within 30 days from the date of a defendant’s arrest or service of summons on the defendant. The Speedy Trial Act further provides that the defendant’s trial must commence within 70 days from the date the information or indictment is filed or from the date the defendant appears before an officer of the court (i.e., an arraignment) in the court where the charge is pending, whichever is later. If the defendant’s trial does not commence within the 70-day timeframe, then the district court judge must dismiss the indictment on motion by the defendant.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]