Bannon's Border Wall Fundraising Scheme Duped Hundreds of NYC Donors, Manhattan DA Says
The former chief strategist in the Trump White House called the charge a politically motivated persecution as he entered the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.
September 08, 2022 at 11:48 AM
5 minute read
A Manhattan grand jury indicted Steve Bannon, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, for his alleged role in funneling a $250,000 salary to the head of a nonprofit organization that aimed to build a wall on the U.S. southern border, after promising all the proceeds would go directly toward its construction.
Bannon pleaded not guilty to two counts of money laundering in the second degree, two counts of conspiracy in the fourth degree, one count of scheming to defraud in the first degree, and one count of conspiracy in the fifth degree.
The charges are not bail eligible. But he was required to surrender his passports.
Bannon's lawyer is David Schoen, a solo practitioner who focuses primarily on complex civil and criminal cases.
The case was continued to Oct. 4.
Bannon was chairman of the advisory board for We Build the Wall Inc., a nonprofit organization with the goal of building a wall between the United States and Mexico.
"Today is an important day for justice to our justice system and our continued efforts to uphold the law," New York Attorney General Letitia James said during a news conference.
"Regular, everyday Americans play by these rules, and yet too often, the powerful political interests—they ignore these rules," James said. "They think that they are above the law and the most egregious of them take advantage of hardworking Americans in the process, and Steve Bannon stands out as a perfect example of this blatant inequality."
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg Jr. told reporters Bannon repeatedly pledged that "not a penny" of the donations would be used for purposes other than building the wall.
Bragg said at least $140,000 was laundered by Bannon in a series of payments to We Build the Wall's president throughout 2019.
Tens of thousands of dollars from donor proceeds were transferred to a nonprofit organization Bannon controls, which then paid into the president's salary, in direct contradiction to Bannon's promises, Bragg said.
The indictment said We Build the Wall allegedly transferred the money to various third-party entities. The investigation is ongoing, Bragg said.
The overall yearlong fundraising scheme netted more than $15 million from thousands of donors across the country, based on false pretenses, Bragg said. There are hundreds of alleged victims in Manhattan.
Bannon turned himself in on Thursday shortly after 9 a.m.
Bannon, 68, called the charge a politically motivated persecution as he entered the Manhattan District Attorney's Office Thursday morning.
"This is an irony," Bannon said, the Associated Press reported.
"On the very day the mayor of this city has a delegation down on the border, they are persecuting people here, that try to stop them at the border," he said, referring to a recent trip by New York City officials to Texas.
"This is all about 60 days from the day," he said, referring to the upcoming national election in November.
In an earlier, written statement, Bannon accused Bragg of pursuing "phony charges" against him ahead of the midterm election, saying the Democratic prosecutor targeted him because Bannon and his radio show are popular among Trump's Republican supporters.
The state criminal case mirrors a previous attempted federal prosecution by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, for which Bannon was pardoned by Trump.
After the presidential pardon, Bragg said his office began investigating and determined Bannon had to be held accountable in Manhattan "for his conduct as the architect of this scheme."
Bragg explained that his office's investigation was distinct from the federal probe, using separate statutes.
The top count of the indictment, Bragg said, is a Class C nonviolent felony that carries a sentence ranging from no time behind bars to up to 15 years of incarceration.
Read the indictment here:
The indictment didn't identify two unindicted co-conspirators by name, but The Associated Press linked the case to Brian Kolfage and Andrew Badolato, who pleaded guilty to federal charges in April.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readSCOTUSblog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
2 minute readSnapshot Judgment: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250