This article is in honor and in memory of Angela Susan Scheinberg, to whom I was married on 9/11. Angela was a paradigm of kindness, virtue and integrity. I also honor every American murdered that day.
CPLR 2221(e)(2) provides, in pertinent part, that a motion for leave to renew “shall demonstrate that there has been a change in the law that would change the prior determination.” Unlike CPLR 2221(d)(3), which imposes a 30-day time period for leave to reargue to be made before the expiration of the time in which to take an appeal, 2221(e)(2) imposes no time limit. Redeye v. Progressive Ins. Co., 158 A.D.3d 1208, 1209 (4th Dep’t 2018).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
