A plaintiff Board of Managers of a condominium (board) alleged that a defendant unit owner (owner) had used his unit as a “short-term rental such as Airbnb….” The board had moved to renew a motion for a default judgement with regard to a claim for the cost and expenses of the subject action, including reasonable attorney fees and disbursements, together with interest. The unopposed motion was denied.

The board had previously filed a complaint and an order to show cause for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the defendant. The board alleged that the owner had not used his unit as his residence. Rather, he “rented it out for short-terms as advertised in the Airbnb or similar websites.” The board sought injunctive relief to restrain the owner from renting his unit in violation of the law and the by-laws and house rules of the condominium (governing documents).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]