The FTC Is Now the Nation's Most Formidable Privacy Enforcer
The FTC is continuing its strong interest in privacy issues and looking at new technologies and the new concerns they might raise. In this edition of her Internet Issues/Social Media column, Shari Claire Lewis explores what the FTC has been focusing on in recent months.
October 17, 2022 at 12:00 PM
8 minute read
ColumnsWhile businesses and consumers await a national privacy law (that may or may not ever be enacted), and while states across the country have passed their own (and at times inconsistent) privacy statutes, one powerful force remains regularly active in this area: the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
In July, Kristin Cohen, the acting associate director of the FTC's Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, explained that the agency is "committed to fully enforcing the law against illegal use and sharing of highly sensitive data," such as location, health and other sensitive information. She observed that sensitive data is protected by numerous federal and state laws, including §5 of the FTC Act, and that claims that data is "anonymous" or "has been anonymized" "are often deceptive." She expressed concern that smartphones, connected cars, wearable fitness trackers, "smart home" products and browsers "are capable of directly observing or deriving sensitive information about users," and that when consumers use their connected devices—and sometimes even when they do not—these devices "may be regularly pinging cell towers, interacting with WiFi networks, capturing GPS signals, and otherwise creating a comprehensive record of their whereabouts." This location data "can reveal a lot about people, including where we work, sleep, socialize, worship, and seek medical treatment."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllYou’re Sure You’ve Looked? The Use of Jackson Affidavits and Efforts to Locate Discovery Materials
8 minute readFive Years After Vega Much Remains Unsettled in Pay Frequency Litigation
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1After Botched Landing of United Airlines Boeing 767, Unlikely Plaintiff Sues Carrier
- 2DOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
- 3No Injury: Despite Proven Claims, Antitrust Suit Fails
- 4Miami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
- 5Trump Ordered by UK Court to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250