'The Best Lawyers in New York City': Trump Org Ex-CFO Weisselberg Praises Attorneys as Testimony Ends
Weisselberg, 75, appeared relaxed as he testified about how he earned approximately $1.76 million in unreported compensation, such as a Manhattan apartment, Mercedes-Benz leases and private school tuition for his grandchildren, during 12 years as CFO at the Trump Organization.
November 18, 2022 at 03:39 PM
4 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Under the terms of Weisselberg's plea agreement, he could receive a five-month sentence after testifying as a witness for the prosecution.
- Asked by defense attorneys if he wanted to please prosecutors with his testimony, Weisselberg insisted he prioritized telling the truth.
- Weisselberg is still employed at the Trump Organization, though he's currently on a paid leave of absence. He testified that he has earned more than $1 million in salary and bonus while under indictment.
Before stepping down from the witness stand Friday after nearly two full days of testimony in the criminal tax fraud trial of the Trump Organization, the company's former chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg had a chance to praise his attorneys. Susan Hoffinger, chief of the Manhattan District Attorney's investigation division, asked whether Weisselberg's legal team—including Nicholas Gravante of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, Mary Mulligan of Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman and Bryan Skarlatos of Kostelanetz & Fink—were "some of the best lawyers in New York City." Weisselberg grinned. "Most of them," he answered to chuckles around the courtroom, including from Gravante. "The answer is yes," Weisselberg clarified. Hoffinger asked who pays Weisselberg's legal bills. "The Trump Organization," Weisselberg said. "Even after you betrayed their trust?" Hoffinger asked. "Correct," Weisselberg said. Weisselberg, 75, appeared mostly relaxed as he answered questions from Hoffinger this week, three months after he pleaded guilty to 15 counts, including larceny and tax fraud for earning approximately $1.76 million in unreported compensation, such as a Manhattan apartment, Mercedes-Benz leases and private school tuition for his grandchildren. His plea agreement with the Manhattan District Attorney's Office included a commitment to testify if called to do so. If he complies with all the terms of the agreement, Weisselberg is set to receive a five-month sentence instead of the maximum available range of five to 15 years. Trump Organization attorneys Alan Futerfas and Susan Necheles focused on that arrangement in the final stages of their cross-examination Friday. Weisselberg insisted he was telling the truth in a brief but intense exchange with Necheles, which ended shortly after an objection from Futerfas. "You're worried, as you sit up there today, that when it comes to sentencing, the prosecutors may argue you didn't tell the truth at trial…that's in your mind as you sit there, right?" Necheles asked. "What is in my mind is to tell the truth at this trial," Weisselberg said. "You're worried what your sentence is going to be?" Necheles asked. Weisselberg started to answer with the words "I imagine if I tell the truth it'll be exactly…" before Necheles cut him off. "Are you really saying to the jury you don't care what your sentence is going to be?" she asked. Acting Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan sustained an objection from Hoffinger at that point. Necheles asked Weisselberg whether he understood that "the prosecutors, at the end of this trial, will be arguing whether or not you told the truth." "I don't know what the procedure is," Weisselberg said as Futerfas stood up to object in what appeared to be a rare display of friction between lawyers who have sat together at the defense table throughout the trial. While Necheles represents the Trump Corporation and Futerfas represents the Trump Payroll Corporation, the two entities named in the indictment are both under the Trump Organization umbrella and have often been conflated during the course of the trial. Futerfas later returned to a similar line of questioning, repeatedly asking Weisselberg whether he "has to make" the prosecutors "happy." "I have to tell the truth," Weisselberg answered at least twice. During cross-examination, Weisselberg also repeatedly volunteered that he was, in fact, guilty of the crimes for which he was indicted. The five-month proposal required Weisselberg to plead guilty "to the entire indictment," Futerfas observed. "You had to allocute, you had to say and plead guilty to all the charges in the indictment to get that time?" he asked. "Correct. Which I was guilty of," Weisselberg said. On re-direct examination, Hoffinger asked Weisselberg to return to one of the strongest points of Futerfas' cross-examination on Thursday, when Weisselberg repeatedly answered "yes" to Futerfas' questions about whether he acted only for his own gain in executing the fraud scheme. "On cross, you said all of this, the way you conducted this scheme, was done solely for your benefit," Hoffinger said. "Was that entirely accurate?" Weisselberg softened his answer, noting there was "some" benefit to the Trump Organization related to payroll taxes. "It was primarily my greed," he maintained. Weisselberg previously testified that he is on a leave of absence from the Trump Organization, where he most recently served as senior adviser. He said he still earns more than $1 million per year in salary and bonus and "hopefully" will receive an annual bonus totaling half a million dollars in early 2023.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View AllLuigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
4 minute readTikTok’s ‘Blackout Challenge’ Confronts the Limits of CDA Section 230 Immunity
6 minute readLuigi Mangione Charged in Federal Court for Stalking, Murder and Firearms Offenses
Luigi Mangione Indicted on Charges Including First-Degree Murder in Shooting of Health Insurance CEO
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250