Two Rulings Impact Enactment and Enforcement of High-Profile Legislation
In this edition of their Northern District Roundup column, Adam Shaw and Jenna Smith discuss two recent noteworthy decisions granting preliminary injunctions enjoining the enactment/enforcement of recently-passed high-profile legislation in New York state. In the first decision, 'Variscite NY One v. State of New York', the court found that certain requirements of New York state's retail license program for recreational cannabis violated the dormant Commerce Clause. In the second, 'Antonyuk v. Hochul', the court held that several aspects of the state's revised conceal carry restrictions violated the Second Amendment and were unenforceable.
December 14, 2022 at 11:00 AM
8 minute read
LegislationThis column addresses recent noteworthy decisions of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. This installation focuses on two decisions granting preliminary injunctions enjoining the enactment/enforcement of recently-passed high-profile legislation in New York state. In the first decision, U.S. Senior District Court Judge Gary L. Sharpe found that certain requirements of New York state's retail license program for recreational cannabis violated the dormant Commerce Clause. In the second, U.S. District Court Judge Glenn Suddaby held that several aspects of New York state's revised conceal carry restrictions violated the Second Amendment and were unenforceable.
Judge Sharpe Temporarily Enjoins New York From Issuing Retail Licenses for Recreational Cannabis in Five Geographic Regions. In a highly anticipated decision, Judge Sharpe granted plaintiff Variscite NY One's (hereinafter plaintiff) motion for a preliminary injunction, on the basis that certain of New York state's requirements to obtain a retail license for recreational cannabis violated the dormant Commerce Clause. Variscite NY One v. State of New York et al., No. 1:22-cv-1013-GLS-DJS, Dkt. No. 28 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2022)
After legalizing cannabis for nonmedical use by adults over the age of 21 in March 2021, New York regulators sought to create a licensing program that gave preference to those convicted of cannabis-related crimes or who were otherwise harmed by decides of policies targeting those who grew, sold, and used cannabis in New York state. In August and September 2021, New York began accepting applications for the first 150 retail dispensary licenses pursuant to the conditional adult-use retail dispensary application program (CAURD). Specifically excluded from consideration were individuals who had been arrested, but not convicted, on cannabis-related charges in New York as well as people who had only federal or out-of-state convictions. See 9 N.Y.C.R.R. 116.1-.9.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppealability of Prejudgment Orders: CPLR 5512, Court of Appeals, Legislative Intent
10 minute readMany Americans Don't Trust the Supreme Court This Election; David Boies Isn't One of Them
NY Top Court Punts Certified Foreclosure Question Back to 2nd Circuit
Navigating the Corporate Transparency and New York LLC Transparency Acts: A Guide for Trust and Estates Attorneys
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in U.S., Other Countries
- 2Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 36th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 4On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
- 5After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250