'Progressives Definitely Did Not Want Him': Mixed Reactions to LaSalle as Chief Judge
Judge Hector LaSalle is the presiding justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department in Brooklyn, said to be the country's busiest appellate court, and where he has been credited for reducing substantial case backlogs.
December 22, 2022 at 05:44 PM
8 minute read
JudgesAgainst a wave of opposition from progressive groups, Gov. Kathy Hochul nominated Appellate Division Judge Hector LaSalle as New York's next chief judge, potentially making him the first Hispanic to sit in the high court's middle bench seat, while, to the dismay of some, returning its composition to four former prosecutors.
But apart from those critics, and a letter signed by more than 45 New York law professors in opposition to LaSalle's nomination, the pick was saluted by several legal observers.
|'The Governor Ignored the Static'
"What is noteworthy about the LaSalle selection is that the governor ignored the static from progressive, left-wing ideologues, both in the Legislature and the academy, and instead selected a moderate and capable centrist judge," said Morrison Cohen partner and retired Appellate Division, First Department Judge David Saxe.
LaSalle is the presiding justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department in Brooklyn, said to be the country's busiest appellate court, and where he has been credited for reducing substantial case backlogs.
If confirmed by the state Senate, LaSalle would replace former Chief Judge Janet DiFiore, who retired unexpectedly in August, four years shy of mandatory retirement age.
John Buonora, a retired former chief assistant district attorney in Suffolk County who worked with LaSalle in that office, said he was "absolutely thrilled" to hear of LaSalle's nomination.
"He will make a great chief judge," Buonora, an adjunct law professor at Touro University, said. "I think that those who opposed Judge LaSalle's nomination because of his prosecutorial background may be pleasantly surprised about how fair and evenhanded he is on criminal justice issues."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBiden Squeezes in U.S. District Court Nominee for New York Before Term Ends
Family Court Judge Moving to State Supreme Court in Western New York
Retired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250