Push to Codify Immigrants' Right to Counsel Taken to NY Capitol
An immigration-rights group is asking for a $100 million allocation in the fiscal 2024 state budget. This would include a $55 million investment in launching the first year of the Access to Representation Act.
January 09, 2023 at 05:10 PM
3 minute read
Immigration LawIn the face of New York's markedly increased immigration population—due in part to the transportation of 30,000 asylum seekers to the state from Texas—a coalition converged on the New York Capitol on Monday to demand that the upcoming budget provide them a right to counsel.
The New York Immigration Coalition continued with its campaign to help immigrants facing deportation.
According to the coalition's spokesman, Reed Dunlea, it is asking for a $100 million allocation in the fiscal 2024 state budget.
This would include a $55 million investment in launching the first year of the Access to Representation Act, a bill that lawmakers declined to take action on during the legislative session that concluded in June.
The coalition also requests that immigration legal funding services within the Liberty Defense Project increase from its current $12 million, to $35 million. The project provides free legal assistance and representation to immigrants in New York through a network of experienced nonprofit attorneys, pro bono lawyers, and other legal professionals and law students.
Another $10 million is requested for the urgent legal needs for asylum seekers.
Assemblymember Catalina Cruz, a Colombian-American immigration attorney and Democrat from Queens, told rally-goers she's honored to represent Corona, Jackson Heights, and parts of Elmhurst, a district with the highest number of non-citizen New Yorkers.
Cruz said her district consists of a great number of immigrants who qualify for administrative relief from the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and asylum seekers.
"These are also the people who cannot afford to pay for a $10,000 lawyer to defend themselves from a deportation," Cruz said.
"When you go to court, the government who is trying to deport and separate you from your family is represented by a lawyer, and all we want is to have that same chance, that when our family member, when our neighbor goes into that courthouse, they're represented by someone. And they're not going broke or having to borrow from a loan shark to be able to get that chance," she said.
Cruz said the constitution should allow people who are facing immigration in a civil court to have the same right to counsel as someone facing immigration in a criminal proceeding.
"We want to take advantage of immigration labor, but when it comes to defending their rights, when it comes to giving them a chance at a fair life in the United States, we're saying figure it out yourself; you pay for it yourself," Cruz said.
State Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, who sponsored the Senate version of the bill, said: "I can't imagine what it must be like if you're not from this country, if English is not your first language, if you can't navigate New York's legal system—and by the way who can navigate New York's legal system and appear before a judge where they may issuing a deportation order?"
"This is about protecting the lives and dignity and the totality of families, making sure that we support our immigrant neighbors, ensuring individuals who are facing deportation are not sent back to a nation where they may be killed because of their political or personal beliefs, or who they love," Hoylman added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Court Suspends NY Immigration Lawyer Now Practicing in Texas
Woman Found Guilty of Murdering Lawyer Who Dropped Her as Client
A Little-Noticed Supreme Court Opinion That Could Bring Huge Consequences
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250