Fraud has a tendency to ooze across borders, and fraudsters often locate in the jurisdiction of greatest laxity. This sets up an inevitable tension between prosecutorial zeal and legal doctrine. As most practitioners well know, U.S. law mandates a strong presumption against the extraterritorial application of a U.S. statute to foreign conduct. Since Morrison v. Nat'l Australia Bank, Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), this has been the law, and it has been enforced fairly strictly in cases involving private litigation. But once we move to the public enforcement arena, outcomes become less predictable.