A respondent tenant (tenant) had moved to vacate a stipulation (stipulation) which had been consented to while both parties had been represented by counsel, to dismiss the proceeding and impose sanctions.

The landlord had commenced an “expired lease holdover proceeding.” The stipulation provided that the tenant vacate the subject apartment in September 2022 and the tenant agreed to apply for the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP). The landlord had agreed to pay the tenant $3,000 “in consideration of her timely vacatur.” The landlord had thereafter discharged his counsel and appeared pro se.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]