Getting Away: Ending New York Tax Residency
The New York Department of Taxation and Finance has a sophisticated residency audit program that frequently audits taxpayers who claim to have relocated.
January 27, 2023 at 02:30 PM
8 minute read
So you have decided to move out of New York and make your primary home in another state or country. You may expect to reduce your income tax liability since New York taxes all income earned by its residents but only taxes nonresidents on income derived from New York sources or allocated to days worked within the state. Obtaining nonresident status could yield substantial savings as New York's marginal income tax rates can be as high as 10.9% (without even considering separate New York City income taxes). But are you a nonresident? The New York Department of Taxation and Finance has a sophisticated residency audit program that frequently audits taxpayers who claim to have relocated.
The Subjective Domicile Standard
An individual's domicile determines status as a resident or nonresident for New York tax purposes. Domicile is the fixed and permanent home to which a person intends to return whenever absent. Where an individual has multiple homes or travels frequently, determining domicile can be highly subjective, often requiring a fact-intensive inquiry to form a picture of intent.
When a New York resident moves out of state, the taxpayer bears the burden to prove the change of domicile by clear and convincing evidence. Bodfish v. Gallman, 378 N.Y.S.2d 138 (NY App. Div. 1976). An individual can only have one domicile at any given time. States, however, can differ in their views on where someone is domiciled and are not bound to respect the determination of another state. Matter of Rudolph (deceased) & Loretta Zapka, DTA No. 804111. Upon audit, the taxpayer must present sufficient evidence to convince the Department that another home has supplanted a New York home as the taxpayer's domicile. If the taxpayer is still in a New York state of mind, domicile may not have changed despite spending significant time in one or more homes outside of New York. The taxpayer cannot shift the burden by merely filing New York nonresident income tax returns that do not get audited. Each tax year stands alone, and a failure to audit a prior-year return does not imply acceptance of the taxpayer's position that domicile has changed or shift the burden of proof if the Department audits a nonresident income tax return for a subsequent year. Matter of Richard & Carolyn Farkas, DTA No. 809927.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Judgment of Partition and Sale Vacated for Failure To Comply With Heirs Act: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest Judgment of Partition and Sale Vacated for Failure To Comply With Heirs Act: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2021/07/Scott-Mollen-767x633.jpg)
Judgment of Partition and Sale Vacated for Failure To Comply With Heirs Act: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
![Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/382/2023/05/generation_gap.jpg)
Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
8 minute read![Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2019/03/10_Estate_Plan_Doc_MI600.jpg)
Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
7 minute read![Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024 Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2022/03/05_Stacking_Coins_Money_Savings_Shutter_640x640.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250