ERAP and Its Impact on Landlord-Tenant Litigation
Since its inception, ERAP has put a tremendous strain on landlords seeking to have their cases heard on the merits due to the tremendous backlog of cases that are either awaiting determinations from OTDA, or having a motion heard by the court to vacate a stay in effect.
February 06, 2023 at 10:30 AM
19 minute read
In 2019 the newly elected, left-leaning, State Legislature passed the Housing Stability Tenant Protection Act (HSTPA), which literally turned almost a half-century of landlord and tenant law on its head. This law was clearly designed to help tenants and to make it more difficult for landlords to commence or follow through on any type of eviction proceedings. Notwithstanding the chaos that it created in NYC's Housing Court, which was already struggling with an overwhelming caseload, no one could predict that in March 2020, the entire NYS court system would come to a grinding halt with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In time, as the courts slowly became operational to a degree, the methodology of dealing with cases in every court was permanently altered.
In a new effort to protect tenants from eviction as the world was coping in virtually complete lockdown, the woke Legislature, in its "infinite" wisdom, passed legislation that would indefinitely prevent landlords from either moving forward with matters commenced pre-pandemic or initiating new ones.
On June 30, 2020, the governor signed the Tenant Safety Harbor Act (TSHA) (Chapter 127 of the laws of New York 2020), which provided protection from eviction for renters who had experienced financial hardship during the pandemic. It prohibited courts from evicting residential tenants who experienced financial hardship for nonpayment of rent that occurred or became due during the COVID-19 period. It applied to any unpaid rent accrued between March 7, 2020, and a yet to be determined date when COVID related restrictions would be lifted. The statute did not define the term "hardship". Thereafter on Dec. 28, 2020, the legislature passed a statute known as "CEEFPA" (COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Protection Act). This statute stayed all pending residential eviction proceedings for 60 days and provided a further stay through May 1, 2021, to those tenants who provided the landlord a hardship declaration declaring they have been negatively impacted as a result of the pandemic. For people experiencing financial hardship and those who were unable to move during this period due to an increased risk of severe illness or death due to COVID-19, this statute also stayed all pending residential procedures for an indefinite period with no recourse for the landlord to contest any cases where a "Covid Hardship Declaration" was presented to the landlord or the state or the court. It further mandated that the landlord provide these forms to every tenant and or household that they rented to, adding yet an additional burden on the landlord. As a result of a tenant's or occupant's ability to "self-declare" his or her hardship without any further documentation, causing all pending or future litigation to cease, an action was brought to challenge CEEFPA's constitutionality, which ultimately ended up in the U.S. Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEnemy of the State: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Criminal Prosecutions after ‘Halkbank’
10 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWhistleblowers Are Here To Stay: Counseling Corporate Clients on Whistleblower Programs
9 minute readTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250