Governor Hochul: To Be Tough on Crime, Get Rid of Bad Prosecutors
One thing is inescapably clear. Just as New York state's Judicial Conduct Commission dramatically reformed the way judges in New York state conduct themselves, the Prosecutor Conduct Commission will almost certainly produce the same positive result.
February 06, 2023 at 10:45 AM
6 minute read
The failure of some prosecutors to faithfully execute their enormous power is by now a familiar reality. Prosecutors who violate the rules can bring terrible consequences. The lives of people accused of crime, and their families, can be destroyed forever, especially when the prosecutor's misconduct sends an innocent person to prison for the rest of their life. People with upstanding reputations can find those reputations ruined by an overzealous prosecutor. And prosecutors who break the rules shatter the public's perception that criminal proceedings are fair and produce just results. Most shockingly, prosecutors who break the rules and cause untold harm are almost never held accountable for their shameful conduct. Indeed, they even get promoted. A New York Times editorial characterized New York state's system that fails to discipline bad prosecutors a "prosecutor-protection racket." ("How Can You Destroy a Person's Life and Get a Slap on the Wrist," Dec. 2, 2021).
It is indisputable that year after year misconduct by prosecutors continues unabated. And it is pervasive. Hundreds of criminal convictions are tainted by the misconduct of errant prosecutors and many of these convictions are reversed. One of the most egregious kinds of misconduct by prosecutors is to hide evidence that may exculpate a defendant. The prosecutor alone gathers and processes all the evidence in a case and the police are always first at a crime scene. Some of the evidence that is uncovered may be incriminating and some may be favorable to the defendant and might actually show innocence. But the defendant and defense counsel know nothing about this evidence. And since it is the prosecutor who decides what evidence to use at trial to get a conviction, the prosecutor has the power to conceal evidence not used that may exonerate the defendant but as to which the defense remains unaware.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Time for Action: Attorneys Must Answer MLK's Call to Defend Bar Associations and Stand for DEI Initiatives in 2025
4 minute readThe Public Is Best Served by an Ethics Commission That Is Not Dominated by the People It Oversees
4 minute readThe Crisis of Incarcerated Transgender People: A Call to Action for the Judiciary, Prosecutors, and Defense Counsel
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger
- 2General Counsel Accused of Destroying Evidence
- 32,000 Docket Entries: Complex South Florida Dispute Sets Precedent
- 4Incoming Howard University Law Professor Kiah Duggins Among DC Plane Crash Victims
- 5Bass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250