The New Gray Zone? A Potentially New Approach to Attorney-Client Privilege in Internal Investigations for Current Employees Who Have Given Notice
The First Department's holding in 'BDO' is one that corporations and outside counsel conducting internal investigations and considering potential privilege issues should keep in mind.
February 08, 2023 at 11:00 AM
6 minute read
In September 2022, the First Department upheld an order to compel production of videotaped interviews with two company employees conducted as part of an internal investigation. See BDO USA v. Franz, 208 A.D.3d 1088, 1089 (1st Dep't Sept. 27, 2022). In doing so, the First Department held that BDO could not have had a reasonable expectation that these interviews would be privileged because the employees had given notice prior to their interviews. Without question, in determining the scope of attorney-client privilege, courts have already distinguished between current and former employees. See, e.g., Radovic v. City of New York, 642 N.Y.S.2d 1015 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. April 16, 1998). But here, the First Department considered what happens in the in-between—when employees are employed with the company but have already tendered their resignation. The First Department's holding is one that corporations conducting internal investigations or otherwise considering potential privilege issues should keep in mind going forward.
In BDO, the company launched an internal investigation into whether a former partner had conspired with other employees to lure employees, clients and business away from BDO. As part of that investigation, corporate counsel interviewed current employees (now defendants) Matthew Franz and Donald Sowell after they had tendered their resignations, but a few weeks before they actually left the firm. Per common practice, counsel for the company provided "Upjohn warnings" to the individuals before beginning the interviews. After this internal investigation had concluded and after both Mr. Franz and Mr. Sowell had left BDO, BDO sued Mr. Franz and Mr. Sowell in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, for among other things, breach of contract based on the alleged breach of their employment contracts with the company. During that litigation, defendants sought to compel production of the videotapes of the interviews they gave to BDO's in-house counsel and outside counsel during the internal investigation. After several rounds of motions, the Supreme Court issued an order to compel production of the unredacted videotapes. See BDO USA v. Franz, 2022 WL 2663324 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. July 7, 2022).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ill-Gotten Gains'?: Cadwalader Alleges Beef Price-Fixing Conspiracy Hurts McDonald's
2 minute readCourt Annuls NYC's Foie Gras Ban In Support of State's Right-To-Farm Laws
9 minute readPlaintiffs May Effectuate Service Via iMessage and WhatsApp, Judge Rules
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250