Oral arguments over the legality of Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corporation’s so-called “lawyer ban” focused in large part on whether a lower court could impose an injunction halting a part of the ban, or whether its power should be constricted to meting out damages.

But during some of the most heated moments, the arguments also addressed the “public policy” implications of the controversial prohibition, which chairman James Dolan’s company has imposed against some 90 law firms that are representing clients with lawsuits against MSGE.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]