The Arbitration Agreement: Tips for Drafting an Effective Arbitration Clause
Careful consideration should still be given to an arbitration clause to ensure the client's goals in submitting to arbitration are met. Below are areas to consider when drafting an arbitration clause.
March 20, 2023 at 09:14 AM
6 minute read
Special SectionsAn agreement to arbitrate can empower the parties and afford them a good deal of control over the dispute resolution process. A well-constructed arbitration clause can provide certainty by outlining the process prior to a dispute. Once a dispute arises, it is far more unlikely the parties will reach an agreement as to how an arbitration should proceed. All too often, however, an agreement to arbitrate is one of the last clauses in a contract on which the drafter focuses. While the focus is typically—and appropriately—on the business terms of the agreement, careful consideration should still be given to an arbitration clause to ensure the client's goals in submitting to arbitration are met. Below are areas to consider when drafting an arbitration clause.
Scope. Be particular when identifying the scope of the arbitration agreement. Using terms such as "in connection with" the contract or "under the terms of" the contract have different meanings. Decide whether the parties want a broad arbitration clause that will include any disputes that relate to the agreement or prefer a more tailored agreement that only submits certain disputes to arbitration. If, for example, there is a particular aspect of a transaction that may come into dispute that would best be decided by an expert in that field, then carving out such a dispute may indeed be the prudent course. Just be clear about what is to be arbitrated and what is not. If a standard clause works, use it. But don't be afraid to modify the arbitration clause to suit your client's needs—just be thoughtful and cautious when doing so.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
- 2Disney Legal Chief Sees Pay Surge 36%
- 3Legaltech Rundown: Consilio Launches Legal Privilege Review Tool, Luminance Opens North American Offices, and More
- 4Buchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
- 5A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250