The Promise and Peril of OpenAI and Chat GPT
It is quite possible that 2023 will be "the year of artificial intelligence." It seems impossible to scan the news without encountering an article either extolling the advantages generative artificial intelligence models or raising concerns about its misuse.
March 27, 2023 at 09:30 AM
6 minute read
Special SectionsIt is quite possible that 2023 will be "the year of artificial intelligence." It seems impossible to scan the news without encountering an article either extolling the advantages generative artificial intelligence models or raising concerns about its misuse. Generative artificial intelligence will streamline workflows, automate repetitive tasks, develop new products and services, perform language translation, and create content (including program code). On the other hand, generative artificial intelligence will also automate jobs, displace workers, turbocharge the creation of fake news, deepfakes, and other forms of online misrepresentation and intensify ethical concerns related to the use of artificial intelligence in general, such as the potential for bias, discrimination, and infringement of privacy and intellectual property rights. ChatGPT, the most well-known of these models, was developed by OpenAI, a nonprofit artificial intelligence research company, founded in 2015 with the goal of promoting and developing friendly AI in a way that benefits humanity as a whole. The OpenAI platform is designed to help individuals and businesses leverage the power of machine learning, natural language processing, and deep learning to enhance their processes and operations. Although ChatGPT is the most well-known product from OpenAI, OpenAI has developed other products: DALL*E2 creates images and art from a text description; and Whisper transcribes speech into text and can also translate between languages.
ChatGPT, like most generative artificial intelligence models, works by using advanced machine learning algorithms to generate human-like responses to text-based inputs. ChatGPT is based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture and has been trained on a diverse range of internet text, i.e., large amounts of text data have been fed into the neural network, which has learned to recognize patterns and relationships between words and phrases in the data. This training allows ChatGPT to respond to a wide variety of questions and prompts similar in tone and content to the input it receives. When a user provides a prompt to ChatGPT, the model processes the text using its trained neural network and generates a response based on the input. The response is then sent back to the user, and the process repeats for each subsequent prompt.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250