This decision involved an action to, inter alia, quiet title. The plaintiff had moved for partial summary judgment. She alleged that she had “acquired title to a portion of defendants’ property and a structure thereon by adverse possession ….” The defendants argued that since the alleged possession was “neither hostile nor exclusive, extant questions of fact on the issue of adverse possession preclude summary judgment.” The court granted the plaintiff’s motion, in part.

The complaint asserted causes of action to “quiet title, for declaratory judgment, trespass, negligence, nuisance, and conversion.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]