Analysis

The Justice Department's Corporate Enforcement Policy: What's Really Changed?

In this article, authors Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan S. Sack analyze a recent DPA and related remarks by Criminal Division leadership, which shed light on how prosecutors will deal with companies with aggravating factors, such as prior misconduct.

May 02, 2023 at 10:07 AM

10 minute read


Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan S. Sack Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan S. Sack

Early in the Biden administration, the Department of Justice sent a clear message: white-collar criminal enforcement would be a lot tougher—and a higher priority—than during the Trump administration. Years of undue leniency toward companies and executives would be coming to an end.

An October 2021 speech to the ABA White-Collar Institute by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco signaled the new approach. The speech coincided with issuance of an Oct. 28, 2021, memorandum, "Corporate Crime Advisory Group and Initial Revisions to Corporate Criminal Enforcement Policies," which was followed about one year later by a Sept. 15, 2022, memorandum, "Further Revisions to Corporate Criminal Enforcement Policies Following Discussions with Corporate Crime Advisory Group," (the Monaco Memoranda). The Monaco Memoranda stated, among other things, that in deciding whether a company was deserving of leniency a company's entire history of misconduct would be considered (not just conduct similar to the matter under investigation), and to receive credit for cooperation, a company would be required to provide information about all individuals involved in misconduct (not just those who were substantially involved in the misconduct). The memoranda also said that deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) and non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) would be "disfavored" for corporations with a prior record of misconduct, especially if the past conduct was similar to the present investigation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Law Firms Mentioned

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro

    More from ALM