The attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications between attorneys and clients made in connection with the provision of legal advice. A recurring issue faced by litigants and courts is whether the attorney-client privilege applies to communications that involve legal and nonlegal advice that cannot be disentangled. This issue has proved especially problematic when an attorney is advising the client with respect to the preparation of tax returns.

Last year, when the Supreme Court granted certiorari in In re Grand Jury, No. 21-1397, it appeared ready to resolve a split among the circuit courts of appeals regarding the appropriate test for determining whether the privilege protects such “dual-purpose” communications. On Jan. 23, 2023, however, the court dismissed the writ of certiorari in In re Grand Jury as improvidently granted, disappointing practitioners who had hoped for clear guidance on the issue.

‘In re Grand Jury’

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]