Plaintiffs brought a legal malpractice action against law firm Claude Castro and Associates over their dissatisfaction with its work on lawsuits in Housing Court and state Supreme Court arising from carpet beetle infestations in their apartments.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Gerald Lebovits granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action, holding that Castro’s decision to refrain initially from raising a warranty-of-habitability defense in his housing court answer, in favor of raising it as an affirmative claim in Supreme Court, was a strategic choice rather than malpractice.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]